Going through my aggregated feeds today was a pain. Everyone were writing about the WWDC07 keynote stuff and I hadn’t seen it yet. So I had to stop reading and start looking .
And since I blog too little these days, I figured I might as well write down some notes and loosely joined thoughts while watching, so here goes:
Oh, and a funny sidenote: Steve Jobs (or someone else on the demo machine) apparently played WoW the day before the keynote ;)
There might be a second reason, that Safari for Windows is a better idea: search-market share.
From: < http://daringfireball.net/2007/06/wwdc_2007_keynote/ >
It’s not widely publicized, but those integrated search bars in web browser toolbars are revenue generators. When you do a Google search from Safari’s toolbar, Google pays Apple a portion of the ad revenue from the resulting page. (Ever notice the “client=safari” string in the URL query?) My somewhat-informed understanding is that Apple is currently generating about $2 million per month from Safari’s Google integration. That’s $25 million per year. If Safari for Windows is even moderately successful, it’s easy to see how that might grow to $100 million per year or more.I have a different theory regarding the ‘Why Safari on Windows’.
I believe that it was a preemptive requirement to get web developers on PC to develop for iphone.
See, the same way they had to make itunes for PC in order to get people buying the ipods, they thought this time they will go proactive and make Safari on PC, that way they get support for iphone apps from the PC developers.
thoughts?
Nicolas, that’s my initial theory as well, and I still think that’s a part of the reasoning. However I am also pretty sure it’s not the only reason, and the money Gruber mentions probably plays a big part.